Champion Home

Business owners vow to clean up tract under threat of annexation

From left, property owners Lynn West, Don Shaver and Charles Blalock meet with, in foreground, DeKalb County Commissioner Kathie Gannon and Amber Greer-Weaver from DeKalb Beautiful.

A group of property and business owners under threat of annexation along East College Avenue plan to start tidying up the area this month with the help of a county commissioner.

On Feb. 27 commissioner Kathie Gannon will join on a small group of business owners who have protested several state representatives’ plans to annex a tract of unincorporated DeKalb County sitting between Decatur and Avondale Estates. The proposal would essentially bring Decatur’s borders east and Avondale Estates’ borders west along the small stretch of commercial property, making Sam’s Crossing the new border.

Gannon and other county officials protested the annexation proposal – spearheaded by Avondale Estates state Rep. Stephanie Stuckey Benfield – earlier this month, claiming the annexation would drain the county’s already depleted commercial tax base. Under the current proposal, Decatur would absorb about 10 businesses and Avondale Estates would take 22. Benfield said she is pursuing the annexation to better control the appearance of what she says are blighted properties along the industrial tract.

Peggy Gargiulo, one of the property owners, wants to prevent that.

“We’ll be doing any kind of things that we can physically do and make a difference in terms of appearance,” she said. “Every single issue we can address, and there should be no reason for annexation.”

Gargiulo said she and several other business owners have created a list of improvements to businesses along the street that leads into Avondale Estates’ Tudor-themed gateway. That includes picking up trash, tearing away decrepit fencing and repainting some businesses’ exteriors.

Benfield told The Champion earlier this month that her annexation effort stalled after one of the representatives she needed to put the issue to a vote on the House floor pulled her signature – one of 10 Benfield needed to put the measure before the General Assembly.

Gargiulo said Benfield still has plans to push the proposal through and continues to lobby for the final signature. She said she’s hoping to make that unnecessary. “We want to be supportive. We want to be proactive. We want to make a difference,” she said. “We want to do what they want, but we don’t have to be annexed in Avondale to do that.”


Comments (21)

Katrina
Said this on 6/18/12 At 05:38 pm
Don Shaver, one of the business owners, can't even clean up his own backyard that is chock full of code violations (and he does not live in Avondale Estates) much less make improvements to any commercial property.
Said this on 3/1/10 At 10:34 pm
All I know that properties in question need some serious work; everything else should be resolved between the owners and the cities involved. How about, no city taxes for the next ten years on the properties along the College Ave.
pj
Said this on 2/26/10 At 04:56 pm
I am sorry, but this is all about money. It amazing how the residents of Avondale Estates are quickly to point fingers at these properties up for annexation without looking at the real facts:

1) There are over 10 vacancies in the city of Avondale Estates at the current time. Why, because businesses don't want to pay City and County Taxes.

2) Properties in both areas need upkeep.

3) Development for some of the property up for annexation has already a master plan for develpment consisting of mixed-use. It is common knowledge among developers as well as the City of Avondale. But, the economy has taken a toll on commercial development, leaving lenders skeptical. This would be more revenue than just $32,000.

4) The reasons for Annexation of this properties into Avondale Estates are: " to regulate future growth and development, increase the presence of the law and to beautify the gateway to our city." All of these can be done easily without annexation. For those of you, that are interesting in the saftey of this area, the will be a Dekalb County Public Safety meeting on Tuesday, March 2 at 1:00 at the Manual Maloof Building. Plan to attend to voice your concerns. The majority of the crime in the report provided by the City of Avondale were outside the annexation area.

5) The current property owners are working with the County help improve this corridor and are glad to see that The City of Avondale will be joining us Saturday, 2-27. We can work together as a team, without annexation. We as the newly formed, The Business Community group, will be meeting quarterly and also will meet with Commissoner Gannon and Keep Dekalb Beautiful on a regular basis. We will certainly help the City of Avondale if they would like for us to help with a work day for them.

6) Lastly, 18 of 23 property owners are not for this Annexation. Why is it that our voice doesn't matter. Who is going to pay the increase in taxes and absorb the high vacancy rate that Avondale is currently experiencing? You??
Reality
Said this on 2/26/10 At 04:51 pm
Decatur should annex Avondale Estates.
Steve
Said this on 2/26/10 At 11:33 am
I'm not sure of the point of your response. My comment was that the story incorrectly insinuated that Ms. Benfield was a resident of Avondale and that was all. Your response was rant against the woman.

BTW, I live in the City of Decatur.
Jim
Said this on 2/26/10 At 11:24 am
This is demonstrative of Ms. Benefield's judgement. As a realtor with 46 years of experience I can state unequivocaly the City of Decatur and the property owners would benefit more from this annexation than an Avondale annexation. It is perfect for Decatur's progressive government and a needed annexation to the most progressive city in Metropolitan Atlanta for the last 50 years. Decatur is a city that, unlike Avondale, has limited supply of land in terms of market demand for the land. Limited national retail when mega-mergers have created the need to be closer to national retail. If not DeKalb County, Decatur is the natural entity to benefit property owners. As usual Ms. Benefield is demonstrating her poor judgement.
Jim
Said this on 2/26/10 At 11:13 am
Ever consider that the benefit might be the areas association with Decatur. Most people think in terms of Decatur when they are asked about Sam's Crossing or the DeKalb Farmers Market. I have never had anyone mention Avondale when referencing those entities or any of the entities along DeKalb Industrial Way. Most people not living in Decatur or Avondale don't even associate Memorial Drive with Avondale and it is not because of the address. Avondale has not distinguished itself in over 40 years.
Jim
Said this on 2/26/10 At 11:07 am
Revolving door of businesses? With all the vacancy in Avondale in the last 10 years, have you ever considered you should welcome any business that would come there? The businesses that moved into this area had a choice. It is not like they could not have found the same location in Avondale. Think about it. They choose to be in DeKalb County and that might be why the property owners want to remain in DeKalb County.
Jim
Said this on 2/26/10 At 11:03 am
Where are your crime statistics? I don't feel any more or less safe in that area than in Avondale. I feel a lot more relaxed in terms of speed traps. A great deal more comfortable driving through and I have never felt any need or sense of danger. This is about a small municipality that has an outrageous budget, in terms of cost per resident, attempting to raise capital by requiring residents of DeKalb and other counties to "pay for Avondale's mistakes."
Jim
Said this on 2/26/10 At 10:56 am
Threat or fear of losing property value? Most owners I have spoken with simply do not want to lose property value by being in the city of Avondale. Either through increased expenses [real estate taxes] which lower property values due to lowering net operating income in income producing properties or lost property value by being a portion of a city that has demonstrated, until the recent Publix development, which may or may not ever be developed and is certainly an eyesore now, no new development in the last 40 years. Consider this, if no one has developed in downtown Avondal in 40 years that might be a reason these property owners can identify with and independent parties not associated with the property owners or the city can support. It just may be this is not about cost/benefit. It just may be this is about not being in a city that has demonstrated poor leadership and inititive for decades.
Jim
Said this on 2/26/10 At 10:43 am
It's not too late. The issue was only raised recently and the owners responded immediately. The only reason the issued was raised almost a year after the attempt to annex was made was because the city got caught attempting to increase revenue by virtue of annexation without any other reason. The fact that it took Avondale over a year to come up with an excuse is typical of the city government. I think you can be certain these owners will comply with maintaining their properties due to the fact that it will keep them out of Avondale. The benefit is worth much more than the reward.
Jim
Said this on 2/26/10 At 10:36 am
It may be unseemly, but so is downtown Avondale. Take a look at those run-down vacant buildings. Your creditability is called into question by the word "almost". You bought anyway.
Said this on 2/26/10 At 09:03 am
Sorry folks, this isn't about money. The amount of tax revenue at issue here is small. Those who think otherwise have not researched the issue or attended any of the public meetings concerning it.

This is about property owners who don't care about the upkeep, appearance or use of their property so long as they are getting a rent check. My family has lived in Avondale Estates for 10 years. This area has been a run down eye soar for the entire we've been here. The statement that the owners have done everything possible is simply not true.

Annexation will allow both Decatur and Avondale Estates to include these areas in their master plans for development. The property owners, if they weren't so short-sighted, should realize that is a good thing. After all, they've been benefiting from the fact that most everyone thinks their property is already in either Avondale Estates or Decatur.
Mark
Said this on 2/26/10 At 12:25 am
The bottom line is always about MONEY!! What else is there.
oscar
Said this on 2/26/10 At 12:01 am
The City of Avondale wants to annex the property along East College for one reason. Money! They plan to raise the taxes that these 22 properties currently pay to Dekalb County a combined amount of $10,000 to $32,000. They say so on their website.

The City also claims that the area is Crime Ridden, but when you carefully read the crime reports in their presentation, you will find that the majority of the crimes in their report took place outside of the annexation area and out of Avondale's jurisdiction. The truth about their crime ridden area was that it had several cases of vandalism, graffiti and a car that was broken into.

Avondale raised their taxes last year and will raise them again this year because they all want pay raises. The administrative budget calls for over $60,000 in pay raises this year alone. They had a $58,000 raise last year. When the rest of the country is tightening their belts, the City of Avondale is getting Fat off of the tax raises of their subjects.

Next year the City of Avondale will attempt to annex the properties along Laredo Ave and Rio Circle and they plan to raise another $45.000 in tax revenues from those "Dirty Industrial and Commercial businesses".

Why does Avondale want to annex these areas? Mainly because they have already taxed the businesses in the City of Avondale to a point that many have left the area. Just 50 ft north of East College on Clarendon, in "DownTown Avondale " there several run down properties where the businesses have closed and moved out because they could not afford the high taxes. As you drive along East College, from Clarendon, towards Decatur, still in the City of Avondale, there are several run down properties where there are no longer any tenants.

So why is it that Avondale wants to annex in other properties. MONEY!
talia wurtzel blanchard
Said this on 2/25/10 At 09:47 pm
These business owners had their chance. They have turned their heads for more than 10 years on not just the condition of their properties but also the quality of their tenants. Avondale residents are tired of the revolving door of fly-by-night businesses. This corridor sits between two thriving neighborhoods and has a ton of potential. Annex now and let's see if Avondale and Decatur can do what Dekalb County clearly can't.
L.T.
Said this on 2/25/10 At 07:21 pm
“We’ll be doing any kind of things that we can physically do and make a difference in terms of appearance,”

Please.....where has your civic responsibility been all these years? A no-man's land of poorly maintained properties has existed for too long, devaluing property and inviting crime. I can assure you, the primary reason Avondale residents are for annexation is to control what DeKalb County has refused to regulate. This will guide me at the polls next time I vote!
Michael Goettee
Said this on 2/25/10 At 06:24 pm
I almost didn't consider buying my home in Avondale Estates because the track of run-down businesses just east of Sam's Crossing made it look risky. And when one business, a tire store, did "fix up" with shabby materials, the siding started falling off soon after. Too little. Too late is right.
Long Time DeKalb Resident
Said this on 2/24/10 At 12:12 pm
Too little, too late! These business owners could and should have cleaned up their properties long before now. They're only willing to spend a little now to avoid the prospect of having to pay more taxes later. If the annexation is not approved, I have no doubt that this eye sore area will soon revert back to the condition it has been in for as long as I can remember. I have little confidence in these owners' newly found sense of civic responsibility.
Jon
Said this on 2/24/10 At 11:06 am
So, after years of pursuing annexation and it finally coming close to happening, the business owners decide to do something. It does not make me feel comfortable that the owners decided to take action under threat. This is not sustainable and they will surely not maintain the "beautification" once the threat of annexation fades away.

New comments are currently disabled.


Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for News Alerts