Legislators move forward with Decatur, Avondale annexation despite protests

A group of local residents, business owners and county and city officials packed an office near the State House on Feb. 1 to address before DeKalb County’s House delegation the proposed annexation of commercial land along College Avenue by the cities of Decatur and Avondale Estates.

A small tract of land along College Avenue came one big step closer to being annexed by Decatur and Avondale Estates this month.

The DeKalb County delegation of state House members – a group of 20 legislators – granted approval on Feb. 1 to state Sen. Stephanie Benfield to begin gathering signatures to push the annexation proposal to a vote before the General Assembly.

The proposal would essentially bring Decatur’s borders east and Avondale Estates’ borders west along the small stretch of commercial property, making Sam’s Crossing the new border. Decatur would absorb about 10 businesses, and Avondale Estates would take 22. Officials from both cities and Benfield have expressed frustration with the corridor’s industrial look, and Avondale Estates officials said several eyesore businesses could harm their efforts to redevelop their downtown area.

A hearing before the delegation attracted a large group of supporters and protestors, top county officials among them, including CEO Burrell Ellis. While about 13 local business representatives simply expressed their dissatisfaction with being forcibly annexed, county officials said they worried the annexation effort would spark a chain of similar land grabs countywide, further depleting the county’s tax base.

The city of Dunwoody’s decision to incorporate in 2008 could cost the county up to $18 million per year, according to recent projections, and county officials are keen to stanch any future revenue bleeding.

“We need to go back to the drawing board and work together,” county Commissioner Lee May told local representatives.

May and Commissioner Kathie Gannon asked delegation members to hold off on their annexation bill and work with the county to create a comprehensive development plan that would allow both parties to get what they want. The area has been considered for annexation multiple times – as recently as last year – and Rep. Fran Millar, R-Dunwoody, said he believed the county has had enough time to clean up the corridor, which Benfield called “blighted.”

“After all these years… where has the county been? I’ve heard this same argument before in another part of the county,” he said about Dunwoody to applause from Avondale Estates residents.

Gannon conceded that the annexation, which covers .28 miles of land, would not seriously harm the county financially. The annexation could cost the county about $20,000, Commissioner Jeff Rader said. But the county’s residential property taxes do not cover the cost of offering county services, and the county needs to hold on to as much commercial property as it can because it’s taxed at a higher rate, Gannon said.

The county is also, essentially, at local municipalities’ mercy when they consider annexations through local legislator delegations, which do not require a vote from residents.

“The cities have the upper hand,” she said. “They don’t necessarily have to come to the table.”

Millar said he didn’t consider the loss significant. “For $20,000, if the services can be improved to these citizens, I’m trying to figure out why we’re still here,” he said.

Ellis said his administration is reinvestigating the possibility of incorporating all of unincorporated DeKalb County, which could net the county about $31 million in revenue, according to a 2006 study the county commissioned. That amount would plug the county’s projected revenue shortfall next year, he said.

Decatur Mayor Bill Floyd said he didn’t think the College Avenue annexation should be a serious concern for the county.

“There’s a certain amount of savings that they should pick up,” he said. “Though I guess you could question whether they’re doing anything there now.”

Several businesses along the corridor have supported the annexation proposal because they want surrounding businesses to look better, which they believe would improve the value of their own businesses, Avondale Estates Mayor Ed Rieker said.

But a group of business owners disagreed. Joseph Cargiulo said he owns 11 parcels that could be annexed. County development guidelines allow for more development than Avondale Estates’ guidelines, meaning he would less leeway to develop his land he said.

“That would devalue my property, not increase the property,” he said. He added that the delegation was wrong to force businesses into an annexation. “You don’t just go take something from somebody,” he said.

When asked why he had not improved the appearance of some of his businesses over the last 10 years (when Benfield began the annexation effort in earnest), Cargiulo said it was never required of him. He has tenants on all his parcels, he said.

“The proof is in the pudding,” he said. “I have zero vacancies. Avondale has 10.”

Other business owners said they’re struggling through the poor economy and being forced to adopt new beautification standards from Decatur or Avondale Estates could sink their companies.

Cargiulo’s neice, Tonia Cagle, said she disagreed with the delegation’s move forward. “I’ve watched my uncle work his tail off for the past 37 years,” she said. “He’s a self-made man.”

Benfield said this month she’s confident she can get the 10 signatures to send the annexation proposal to the House floor for a vote. If that were to happen, it would likely pass as House members tend to support local bills that local delegations push to the floor.

On Saturday evening, Jan. 30, the marquee sign for Finders Keepers Furniture, located on East College Avenue within the area being considered for annexation, was vandalized. The damaged portion of the sign reads ANNEXATION YES. Owner Bonnie Kallenberg supports the annexation efforts and suspects that the vandalism is an effort at intimidation or intentional destruction of property as a show of protest against her support. “I’m the only person on our block that supports the annexation.” Kallenberg said, “This gateway into the community in disrepair affects all of the Avondale businesses.”


Comments (4)

Steven
Said this on 5/25/10 At 11:21 pm
PLEASE ANNEX THIS PROPERTY. If there's ever been a no-brainer, then this one is it. The property in question is a COMPLETE EMBARRASSMENT to the community's residents and business owners that have the decency to maintain their property. The existing property owners have simply shown no intent to improve the appearance of their property. It's unfortunate that this is what people have to drive past in order to get to the heart of Avondale. Can someone please explain to me how requiring business owners to maintain their property (i.e. to cut the grass, pick up trash, and or fix run down buildings, etc.) could possibly lower the property values, like the current property owners are claiming? Maybe they can provide us examples of other communities that have cleaned up their communities and have subsequently seen a decline in their property values? This is an irrational excuse for the business owners laziness and lack of decency. Frankly, as a resident of this community that wants to see the revitalization of Avondale/Decatur continue, I hope that once the annexation is complete, that the current business owners exercise their God given right...to leave. Good riddance.
Bev
Said this on 3/13/10 At 12:24 am
Annex, annex, annex. The corridor looks really bad, and there are a lot of homeless that hang out in these parts, wandering the neighborhoods, with nothing better to do than snoop around...I know, I see them wander about, taking naps on the grass, even peeing on the lawn in plain view of the public. They leave their shopping carts and trash scattered about and business owners let their roofs collapse and let their businesses look like trash. Business owners have had years to do ANYTHING to clean up, but to no avail, and it's embarrassing looking.

The only business owner who truly cares about his land and property is Skips. That guy is out there all the time, making sure his business looks good, taking pride in the community.
William
Said this on 2/5/10 At 10:43 am
Do not Annex. It is just another way for the Government , who suppose to work for us, should HAVE TO BRING THIS UP FOR A VOTE BY THE PROPLE, NOT THEM ! If it don't pass, it should not be able to bring up again, for at lease 2 yrs. It a shame we have to watch our official's so close. It's easy for them to spend YOUR MONEY.

Every time our official's need money, they say that they need money too repair Roads, so, what do they do, what to get a .01 cent sales tax, and it if it passes, the roads never get repaired.
Threy allway's vote for a raise, for them, and TAKE MONEY from us, the taxpayer.
This will probably not be shown, but I tried.
ray
Said this on 2/5/10 At 07:59 am
Should have stopped Dunwoody before this
Post a Comment
* Your Name:
* Your Email:
(not publicly displayed)
Reply Notification:
Approval Notification:
Website:
* Security Image:
Security Image Generate new
Copy the numbers and letters from the security image:
* Message: