Champion Home

Lawmakers renew Avondale Estates annexation efforts

A sign against annexation in on E. College Ave. in Avondale Estates

A state senator from Avondale Estates still hopes to annex a portion of unincorporated land west of the city’s gateway to clean up blighted areas and some businesses.

State Rep. Stephanie Benfield said she plans to speak this month with DeKalb County’s delegation of House members to put the issue to a vote in this session. Her proposal would essentially extend Decatur’s borders east along College Avenue, absorbing about 10 properties, and Avondale Estates’ boundaries westward, taking about 20 properties, she said.

Sam’s Crossing would become the boundary between the two.

Benfield, who said she’s been trying to pass the annexation since 1999, said she has the support of several delegation members and requires only 10 supporters to bring the issue to a vote on the House floor. Among those supporters are Michele Henson, Mary Margaret Oliver and Stacey Abrams, she said.

“Those businesses along there – not all of them but enough of them for it to be a concern – need cleaning up,” she said. “The citizens of Avondale have really gotten energized and want to see something happen.”

The issue was pressed last year and ended after a large number of business owners protested the plan. Benfield said she’s open to hearing the business community’s concerns but remains unimpressed with their efforts to clean up the College Avenue corridor between Decatur and Avondale Estates over the last decade.

“I’m frustrated. I’m certainly listening to their concerns. I’m certainly not turning a deaf ear,” she said.

Benfield said she plans to present her case to the delegation in the Legislative Office Building in Atlanta on Feb. 1. She added that she expects a contingent of business owners to attend her presentation and protest the plan.

“We’re going to give them their time to let the delegation know their views,” she said.


Comments (4)

John Stone
Said this on 3/10/10 At 10:54 am
The reasons for annexation sound high minded. But if the stated goals were the real ones, they could be reached in other more cooperative ways.

Indeed this is part of a "10 year plan" to gain tax revenue for Decatur and Avondale
Next year it will be more residential properties, as this group goes back after everything they tried to grab last year when they spoke of "better
Decatur schools as the carrot. The Museum should take some of the wind out of their sails.
John
John Weiser
Said this on 1/29/10 At 12:57 pm
If the issue of "cleaning up" this area needs to be addressed, it is common sense that this property is neither the City of Decatur or the City of Avondale Estates. It seems that code enforcement is not being fulfilled by DEKALB COUNTY. If you notice in all of these comments, the position of DEKALB COUNTY is not addressed. Currently it is a DEKALB COUNTY problem, and it surely appears that DEKALB COUNTY has dropped the ball. Being a Decatur native for over 58 years myself, we have always referred to this area as "No Man's Land". It appears, though that those municipalities which want to annex or lay claim to this area are doing so for selfish reasons, forcing those property owners into having to pay DEKALB COUNTY taxes and CITY taxes. Let us ask those property owners "do you want to be annexed or not, and if not, will you voluntarily make some concessions NOT to be under the umbrella of both CITY AND COUNTY ordinances, mandates, laws, regulations and jurisdiction?

My guess is, that if these people wanted to be part of either city municipality, they would have presented their request long before now, but to FORCE these property owners into annexation is unjust!! How about moving Avondale High School into the city digest and tax accordingly, just like Decatur High School does, or pull the DeKalb Farmers Market into the mix (there is some big buck for taxation), and absorb the MARTA repair facility as well and get some Federal dollars.
baseballbuff
Said this on 1/28/10 At 05:47 pm
I am interested in this issue as it has been called to my attention that this is a double bill. If Avondale Estates is passed so is the property for the proposed City of Decatur. I don't think this issue has been understood clearly.

Also, why if 18 out of 23 property owners are against this annexation, is this such an issue for the City of Avondale?

There is some evidence of wear on the proposed properties up for annexation, there is also evidence of wear in the City of Avondale properties as well.

One interesting point, about the closing the gap between two cities is the fact that the Twin Oak Apartments is being left out of this annexation.
Why is that? Is it because this is residential and the City of Avondale might not want to dilute there votes? I'm not sure. There is only access through Avondale Estates to some of this property.

So, proposed City of Decatur property owners hope you are voicing your opinion.
Said this on 1/28/10 At 11:59 am
Reasons for Annexation

The City of Avondale Estates is seeking to annex the commercial properties to Sam’s Crossing to regulate future growth and development, increase the presence of law enforcement and to beautify the gateway to our city.


The area under consideration for annexation has become blighted and is considered by many residents an area prone to criminal activity. Annexation would allow the City of Avondale Estates to provide immediate police protection and law enforcement services.

The proposed City of Avondale Estates annexation includes 23 commercial parcels collectively owned by nine individuals.

The Avondale Estates Business Association supports the annexation and is backed by a unanimous resolution by the Avondale Estates Board of Mayor and Commissioners.

Sam’s Crossing is a natural gateway to the City of Avondale Estates and to the City of Decatur. Completing this annexation will allow the cities of Decatur and Avondale Estates to meet at this natural border.

This area needs planned deliberate growth. The City of Avondale Estates has a full-time code enforcement officer and in 2010 is budgeted to hire a full-time Planning and Economic Development Director. Both cities will have the combined resources to improve and cure this blighted area to make a positive economic impact.

Source: http://avondaleestates.org/resources/annexation/Pr...

New comments are currently disabled.


Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for News Alerts